31 May 2012

行动党包庇粗口政治文化


行动党包庇粗口政治文化,事实全在丘光耀辞职声明里。
自称为民主行动党超人”的丘光耀突宣布辞去该党全国大选备战委员会文宣组组长职务,保留武吉免登区富都文莱支部党员身份。
丘光耀此举是政治策略,以便该党能够继续攻击马华日前引用“割”与“讲鸟话”等字眼。不过,这无助该党抹黑马华。
“这只是策略,他依然会在行动党活动上上台演讲,依然会爆粗”。
丘光耀于面子书的辞职声明中感谢行动党国会领袖林吉祥、秘书长林冠英、副主席兼全国大选备战委员会主席陈国伟,以及社青团团长陆兆福等对他的力挺和宽容,已揭露了行动党包庇粗口政治文化荼毒国人思想的实情。
“行动党现今指责国阵提倡不健康政治文化,而语言暴力的政治文化乃是最先出自行动党,反观国阵未如此无礼低劣”。
马华与行动党的政治文化并不一样,因为马华从未引用粗口,只是以适当字眼作为隐喻,从不恶毒诅咒与咒骂他人。为此,敦促国人拒绝语言暴力文化,以塑造有修养的民族。

30 May 2012

Rocket practising double standards - its two women leaders uphold false sense of justice but silent on own members uncouth slurs

Rocket practising double standards - its two women leaders uphold false sense of justice but silent on own members uncouth slurs

DAP’s Teo Nie Ching and Teresa Kok are nothing but impostors, trying to act as ‘heroes’ but turn a blind eye towards their own member’s vulgar remarks. They lambast MCA President Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek with criticisms for his remark but ignore the defamatory spews by their own comrades.

Assistant National Publicity Secretary of DAP, Teo Nie Ching and National Organising Secretary of DAP, Teresa Kok may have forgotten that DAP elections publicity chief Hew Kuan Yau and DAP Perak Secretary Nga Kor Ming had in the past acted abrasively and hurled slander which are even more humiliating than that which they chide Dr Chua for.
As elected representatives who also hold high positions in their political party, Teresa and Teo always act coy over insensitive, vulgar terminology by their comrades. It is obvious that they are leaders who practise double standards, holding bias judgment towards others. It seems that their definition of ‘vulgar’ varies from society’s norm.
DAP doesn’t take action on its own members who spew derogatory remarks
Hew Kuan Yew regularly foul language in his speeches. He curses, rants and hurl verbal abuses at his own whim even in front of the public’s eye. He even likened the media corp as “prostitutes”. One would expect punishment to be judged on him, but no practical action was taken by DAP.
The same goes to Nga Kor Ming who even went as far as to label Hee Yit Foong a ‘prostitute’, degrading Malaysian women off their pride and dignity. DAP again stood by and turned a deaf ear towards his comments with no consequent action taken. Needless to say, DAP is a biased party practising double standards.
Senator Chew Lian Keng, JP
MCA Youth Federal Territory chairman

21 May 2012

Will PAS’ remarks in ‘muzakarah’ represent Pakatan’s stance? DAP still cannot prevent the implementation of Hudud

Will PAS’ remarks in ‘muzakarah’ represent Pakatan’s stance? DAP still cannot prevent the implementation of Hudud

Based on the conditions set by PAS for the ‘muzakarah’, I conclude that DAP is unable to stop PAS’ bid of achieving a hardline Islamic state. DAP makes numerous empty verbal promises for transformations and changes, to boost their image among the Chinese community but the Rocket cannot even hinder PAS’ goal.

PAS tok guru Dato’ Seri Nik Aziz had said that UMNO would have to abide with several conditions set for them to engage in ‘muzakarah’ with PAS. The first condition set is that UMNO must change its policy whereby Islam must come first. This is a glaring and blatant attempt by PAS to enforce a theocratic Islamic state. Not once will PAS ever forget about their ultimate goal. The dialogue between PAS and UMNO is deliberately held for Pakatan to momentarily put the hudud issue in temporal inactivity.

No matter how often Pakatan holds meetings to discuss on Islamic state and Hudud law issues, a consensus will never be achieved. Pakatan will do whatever it takes in order to capture Putrajaya, including putting up a front of false unity among the three parties. They will just turn a blind eye towards any issue. Promises to solve them are intended to boost their image among supporters who have ditched the Opposition.

Other than Karpal Singh who publicly opposed PAS’ ideas for hudud law and Addin, no other DAP leader has taken considerate action against PAS. Lim Kit Siang’s stance is constantly wavering and he has been quiet over the religious-based regulations enforced by local councils in PAS and other Pakatan-helmed states. The DAP adviser is always eluding the predicament for sake of fostering good ties with PAS.

Much speculation looms on the 13th General Elections and DAP must not remain silent anymore and continue deceiving Chinese voters to cast their ballots for PAS. The Rocket meanders on the fence over PAS’ intentions of implementing Hudud laws and reaching a hardline state.

Senator Chiew Lian Keng
MCA Youth Federal Territory Chairman

20 May 2012

反對新街場-淡江高架大道‧蕉賴居民和平請願 不要大道經過我家


反對新街場-淡江高架大道蕉賴居民和平請願 不要大道經過我家
19/05/2012 16:00
(吉隆坡19日訊)逾百名受新街場-淡江高架大道(SUKE)的蕉賴區居民高舉大字報展開和平請願,堅決反對大道途經超過8個住宅區,干擾超過5000名居民的生活及影響環境素質。
 蕉賴聯成花園及武吉Manda’rina反對新街場-淡江高架大道臨時行動委員會,號召受影響的住宅花園居民,出席在聯成花園舉行的和平請願活動。
 居民身穿反對大道衣服及貼紙,明確表明反對大道途經花園,經過的車輛也紛紛鳴笛支持,警方派出逾10名警員維持秩序,甚至封鎖街道。
接受隧道不要高架道
 居民強調,他們可接受大道以隧道方式經過花園住宅,而不是高架天橋,因為一旦建設高架天橋,影響的不僅是生活,還有產業價值。
 自從聯成花園商民獲悉當地可能興建高架大道后,因為一直沒有明確藍圖及缺乏資訊,坊間不斷流傳可能會有民宅或商店面對拆除厄運。
 商民也擔憂經營超過30年,經歷兩代人的行業會面臨危機,及影響當地產業價值,據悉不少商店及民宅也受影響,目前面對滯銷困境。
 根據藍圖顯示,目前聯成花園主要大路屬于林蔭道,建高架大道后,鋼骨水泥將取代綠蔭環境。
 聯邦花園商民希望大道公司聽取人民心聲,慎重考慮,尋求更佳解決方案,將大道改道,不要經過聯成花園,造成他們面對不可彌補的損失。
 受影響花園包括蕉賴嶺、聯成花園、武吉Mandarina21、阿南達邁、阿南達邁(Merawan)、木蘭園及武吉柏邁花園。
大道公司沒考慮繞道
居民透露,承建這項計劃的Prolintas大道有限公司曾公開路線圖,也說明有交替路,但大道公司幾乎沒有考慮繞道的可能性。
 居民指,儘管他們分別在31日及30日致函各涉及部門,但至今仍無回信,他們擔心大道公司為了趕在6月與大道公司簽署合約,而典當居民的權益。
 收費大道進入住宅區,對當地居民猶如一顆震撼彈,直接影響當地居民30多年來平靜的生活。
 新街場-淡江高架大道將從大城堡恩達廣場穿至阿南達邁輕工業區的電腦驗車中心(PUSPAKOM)后,再以高架天橋方式進入聯成花園,然后再經過蕉加大道,最后銜接第二中環公路。
 這項計劃將涉及吉隆坡市政局、安邦再也市議會兩個地方政府,其中途經蕉賴合大嶺的路段將與國能共用同一個路線,及動用部分武吉峇都布爹森林保留地段。
 出席者包括馬華敦拉薩區會主席周連瓊、武吉Manda’rina反對SUKE大道行動理事會主席柯林斯徒華及律師代表丘應權等。
要求出示環境影響報告
蕉賴聯成花園及武吉Manda’rina反對高架大道臨時行動委員會代表王坤華指出,自從大道特許經營權公司宣佈興建大道的計劃后,當地居民與商家的夢魘就開始了。
 我們要求大道公司出示環境影響報告及社會衝擊評估報告,說服居民。
 他說,未來可以預見,大道公司強硬推行興建大道的墳墓完成后,周邊產業價格會隨之受影響,環境素質將降低。
 他指出,這也造成附近商家生意大受影響,私營化大道公司設立的收費站,將加重當地逾10個花園居民負擔。
 他說,大道公司展示的藍圖在康樂花園路段有交替路,有關交替路也比較短,但途經聯成花園的高架天橋因為涉及不少山坡地段,有近20公里路段。
周連瓊:反對行動將持續
周連瓊指出,反對高架大道的活動會持續進行,週日將在斯嘉鎮及星期一在班丹再也區。
 這是居民第二次反對高架大道的活動,他們已見大道公司,但依然沒有明確的答案。
 他說,雖然這是由吉隆坡市政局批准的路線,但最終還需咨詢居民意見。
影響深遠
★柯林斯徒華
已致函多個部門包括聯邦直轄區城市與福利部、大馬大道局及各相關部門,但至今仍無回信。
 高架天橋非常接近民宅,最近的僅有15尺遠,對我們的生活影響非常大。
 收費站也有24條車道,整個範圍非常大,無論對環境和居民都影響深遠。
傳言四起
★商家張先生(45歲)
經營藥材店超過30年,我們從報章知道這裡有高架大道後,一直很擔心店屋會面對被拆除命運。
 產業價值受影響,坊間也各有傳言,大家都很擔心。
擔心徵地
★商家羅先生(48歲)
目前還沒有明確的路線藍圖,做生意和生活也不安樂。
 很擔心未開門見大道,也擔心店屋會受征地影響。

19 May 2012

非法运作2年 威胁学童健康 家长要轰走洋灰厂


非法运作2年 威胁学童健康 家长要轰走洋灰厂



朱燕平(左)、周连琼及其余家长展示大字报及所收集的签名横幅,以表达不满。



孩子亲手绘上图案,希望洋灰厂撤离还给他们清新的学习环境。



家长提供照片显示,洋灰厂用来储存洋灰的仓库与学校足球场毗邻,而孩子每日在该处活动容易吸入灰尘。



约百名家长昨日在学校带上口罩收集签名反对洋灰厂再拖延搬迁日期。



(吉隆坡19日讯)大型洋灰公司的三根生产烟囱与学校距离只有300米,学生每日在洋灰尘埃当中上课,引发气管及皮肤等问题,令20名家长忍无可忍发出“请快点离开”的怒吼!

20名来自坤城二校的家长周六联合召开记者会,发言人朱燕平指出,他们的孩子自上学后就不时出现眼睛痕痒、手肘脚膝盖处长期处于黑色、皮肤生疮等,而且衣服也布满许多黑色粒子的灰尘,家长起初误以为是孩子在学校顽皮,才会导致衣服肮脏。



烟囱与学校距离仅300米

直到他们在今年初前往学校进行大扫除时,才赫然发现洋灰生产烟囱与学校课室的距离只有约300米,家长们疑事有蹊跷,之后联合数名家长一起搜集资料,并于在2月前往吉隆坡市政厅查询。

“市政厅告诉我们该间工厂的发展准证已逾期两年,让我们震惊该洋灰公司为何没有准证仍可24小时非法运作两年?”

“我们要求这间工程立刻停止运作并且撤离,因为他们污染了空气,更严重危害孩子的健康。”

朱燕平披露,隆市政厅在4月23日第一次前往取缔,但该工厂在25日再恢复运作。接着市政厅再次于5月4日展开第二次取缔行动,该厂管理层要求执法和家长给予1周的时间,以清理场内的机器,但是遭家长的断然拒绝。

“我们感到不满,他们在一周后仍没有撤离,接着又要求运作到7月份,采取一拖再拖的方式,我们在昨日才发现该管理层致函予学校,要求展延至12月,因为他们有许多订单一旦撤离将要赔偿。”



家长不满厂方无视孩子健康

让家长尤其不满的是,洋灰厂的信函中列明倘若撤离,除了耗时耗费,也会面对一定的损失,包括工厂内80%的工人拥有5名孩子以上,一旦搬离或可能面对经济问题等。

“他们在信函中只谈及所面对的亏损,完全无视我们孩子的健康,也没有企业所应有的责任,更何况他们需要履行环境管理职责,为何任由生产洋灰所产生的细微灰尘,由风吹到学校?”

目前学校共有1580位学生,其中24个课室面向洋灰厂3根生产烟囱。烟囱每日生产洋灰会排放气体和大小灰尘,其中最细微的灰尘则随风飘向山上的学校,影响孩子。

家长也在现场怒斥该洋灰厂罔顾孩子的健康,以致孩子长期咳嗽、气管问题不断,甚至有皮肤上的问题,有者更声称孩子的校服和鞋子因为被严重染黑,无法清洗,最终只能丢弃购买新的。

他们希望该厂能够遵守承诺,尽快搬离,以还给孩子一个清新的学习环境。


周连琼:安排三造会面洽商

这20名忧心忡忡的家长今日带同孩子前往向马华敦拉萨镇区会主席周连琼上议员寻求协助及反映问题,周连琼指出,学校甫建好,使用迄今已有5年,毗邻的工厂也有5年之久,他将在近期内安排家长与教育部副部长拿督魏家祥、联邦直辖区城市与福利部部长拿督拉惹隆仄会面,希望两造能够插手协助处理此事。

另一方面,周连琼在现场记者要求下致电洋灰厂负责人之一的陈先生,但陈先生以不愿回应,拒绝透露该厂在此事上的进一步行动。



书到用时:水泥粉尘污染环境

水泥生产过程中的职业危害主要粉尘,从原料粉碎、细磨、烧成、成品水泥细磨,直到水泥成品包装、运出等,所有设备和运输系统都产生粉尘,粉尘不但污染作业场所,而且从烟筒放出去的每小时以吨计的大量粉尘,是造成环境污染的重要来源。洋灰中含有烙酸盐(也叫烙酸酯,Chromate),是一种化学物质。得变应性皮肤炎者,以接触洋灰者为最常见。



15 May 2012

No consensus on hudud at Pakatan meeting as Kit Siang had disregarded Karpal Singh

No consensus on hudud at Pakatan meeting as Kit Siang had disregarded Karpal Singh
It is sad that DAP said nothing to oppose the religious extremism remarks made by their comrade-in-arms PAS regarding hudud law during the Pakatan senior leadership meeting yesterday
The meeting yesterday had failed to reach a consensus as Pakatan leaders tried to avoid the issue by giving unclear and token answers over the issue which did nothing to clear the people’s doubts.
DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang, who had attended represented DAP at the meeting, had only said at the press conference that hudud law was not part of the Pakatan Rakyat’s Buku Jingga manifesto. This proves that Lim Kit Siang had failed to strongly express his objections, or even Karpal’s views and the views of the other non-Muslim leaders in Pakatan, at the meeting. This has prevented the meeting from reaching a clear agreement on the issue, thus disappointing DAP and the public. 
If Lim Kit Siang does not have the courage or ability to express his party’s stand and the stand of other non-Muslims, then perhaps he should have instead sent DAP Chairman Karpal Singh to speak instead of wasting this opportunity. 
It is also disappointing that DAP Secretary-General Lim Guan Eng has chosen to support PAS President Dato’ Seri Hadi Awang which seems like dismissing Karpal’s statement as his own personal views as used before. In defending his own interest, Guan Eng had chosen to support Hadi Awang over his own party’s chairman, showing that DAP senior leaders cannot be trusted as they will continue to allow PAS to walk over and dominate them, thus forsaking non-Muslims rights, as DAP has no status in Pakatan and is only a yes-man party to PAS.  
DAP, as one of the Pakatan allies, should not choose to remain silent or refrain from speaking out their support or opposition towards PAS. When members of their own party dare to speak out against other Pakatan leaders or PAS leaders, DAP will take various measures to deal with it such as taking disciplinary action, or dismissing contradicting statements a personal view, or even not re-appointing those members for any position. 
On the other hand, MCA President Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek has already made our party’s position clear beforehand; that Malaysia is a multi-racial country, and the implementation of hudud laws is bound to affect non-Muslims.
Senator Chiew Lian Keng, JP
Chairman of MCA Youth Federal Territory

09 May 2012

行动党一言堂文化不容党内异议

行动党强硬手段撤换阿都阿兹
凸显一言堂文化不容党内异议
(吉隆坡9日讯) 马青中委周连琼上议针对民主行动党副主席东姑阿都阿兹的上议员任期届遭撤换一事指责,行动党奉行党内一言堂的文化,欲堵住一切不中听的话,甚至不惜打压党内持有不同意见及立场的异议分子,处理方式俨如现代版希特拉嚣张霸道。
“一旦遇到任何不中听的话,行动党都会惯性地封杀所有“逆耳”的话,并做出指责及处分,声称不应把党内不同的声音带出来,因此往往某位领袖说出真心话,最后的下场都是遭到谴责或是指其言论不代表党的立场,这些举止都一一凸显行动党眼里容不下一粒沙子的霸道行为,当然东姑阿都阿兹也不例外。”
也是直辖区州团长的他指,东姑阿都阿兹上议员届满遭撤换压上的最后一根稻草极可能是他日前发表反对在独立广场举行428静坐大集会言论,并与行动党积极响应的立场相左所致。即使是当年以高姿态加入行动党的东姑阿都阿兹,如今也只是道出一句真心话就惨遭撤换,迅速打入冷宫遭雪藏,最后也只能自艾自怨“入错党深似海”。
“行动党常会以独权强硬的处理手法,来惩治党内的异议分子,而凡事与行动党持有不同声音的领袖都会透过党内的封口令进行消音,再来个内部处分,杀一儆百以儆效尤,避免党内异议声音外传。”
他也奉劝行动党应秉持兼听则,偏信则的大原则,应虚心接受不中听的话,不要凡事都一味的以封口令来堵住事实,毕竟纸是包不住火的,只要该党仍存在有“良心”的人,事实迟早是会公诸于世。

DAP’s tough measures against Senator Tunku Abdul Aziz highlights their objections to any form of differing opinions

DAP’s tough measures against Senator Tunku Abdul Aziz highlights their objections to any form of differing opinions
The decision by DAP to drop their Vice Chairman Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim from his senator position is typical of DAP’s actions in attempting to block all forms of dissent within the party even if their views and positions are different, and this is very much similar to what Adolf Hitler did in the past.
Once a member says anything contrary to the party’s position, DAP will block them out. When a leader says out something different DAP will condemn the statement and dismiss it as the member’s own personal opinion. All these highlight the fact that DAP is unable to tolerate any other overriding behaviour, and Tunku Aziz is no exception.
Tunku Aziz’s comments on the Bersih 3.0 Duduk Bantah rally on April 28 was opposite to DAP’s stand and position. The respected statesman in DAP was quickly frozen and left out simply because he had spoken the truth.    
DAP acts tough on any form of individuality within the party, and they think that they have the right to punish dissidents who have differing opinions by imposing gag orders and implementing internal disciplinary actions. These actions act as a deterrent to other members from speaking out.
Thus I urge DAP to stop being biased and to humbly accept even the unpleasant statements, and not simply try to block the truth. After all, where there is smoke, there is fire, and as long as there are people in the party who still have their conscience, sooner or later the truth will come out.
Senator Chew Lian Keng, JP
MCA Youth Federal Territory Chairman

红登记持有者欲申请蓝登记注意事项

红登记持有者欲申请蓝登记

自从报章在26.8.09刊登有关“红登记持有者欲申请蓝登记”在短短几天内我的手机电话便接获千多通来电,让我应接不暇。在此向未克及时接听来电者说声抱歉.


“我在首两天之便接获六百多通有关红登记持有人申请公民权及大马公民外籍配偶的询问电话,让我自觉应接不暇”。所以把电话来电转于马华总部。

由于拨入的电话众多,很多时候导致通话在半途中断,或是无法接通。不少人抱怨说我的电话无法接通,也有人在通话中多次中断,让我感到很抱歉。

由于询问公民权申请课题人士众多,在此促请全国欲申请公民权WARGANEGARA的红登记持有人及 永久居留证PERMIT MASUK。联络马青总团进行询问和递交文件。

对于曾经提出申请者,必须提供参考编号 NO RUJUKAN以供查证。然而,还没有正式提出申请的人士,他们必须依程序提出申请。马青总团在收集有关申请资料後将提有关申请资料于内政部跟进及查证。

马青总团这次的专注点将放在纠缠已久的红登记持有人申请公民权WARGANEGARA和大马公民外籍配偶永久居留证PENDUDUK TETAP

在此促请公众下载马青总团公民权申请表格,填妥后与相关文件一并寄至马青总团通讯处。

地址:
PEMUDA MCA KEBANGSAAN 7th Floor Wisma MCA,163 Jalan Ampang,50450 Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia.

公众人士若有疑问,联络电话
03-21618044( 转接马青总团 ) 传真03-21626764

红登记持有者的申请程序
红登记持有者申请公民权WARGANEGARA需在当地国家登记局JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA (JPN)

依马来西亚宪法申请如下:
-
公民权分类
PERKARA 14 (1)(a) 凡在31/8/57196210月前马来半岛出生者
PERKARA 14 (1)(b) 凡在马来西亚日后出生的孩子
PERKARA 15 (1) 196210月之后与大马丈夫结婚之外国太太
PERKARA 15 (2) 大马公民21岁以下之孩子(外国出生)
PER KARA15 (A) 特别情况(领养孩子)
PERKARA 16 18岁以上在马来亚联邦出生或独立前居住马来亚 超过7.
PERKARA 16 (A) 18岁以上在沙巴及砂劳越出生或马来西亚日前居住 超过7.
PERKARA 19 在独立日后移居的外国人.

* 独立日为 31.08.1957 * 马来西亚日为16.09.1963

大马公民外籍配偶的申请程序大马公民外籍配偶的申请永久居留证PENDUDUK TETAP需在当地移民厅JABATAN IMIGRESEN MALAYSIA ( JIM )申请 PERMIT MASUK.

然而中国,越南及朝鲜籍太太必须到移民厅总部JABATAN IMIGRESEN MALAYSIA ( JIM ) PUTRAJAYA申请PERMIT MASUK

周连琼

马青联邦直辖区州团团长lkchiew@streamyx.com

壮大警力运动宣传片